CIPP vs. Traditional Sewer Line Replacement: Pros and Cons

When your sewer line needs repair, you have two main options – CIPP pipe lining or traditional pipe replacement. How do you choose between cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining and just digging up and replacing your old sewer line? Here we’ll compare and contrast the pros and cons of CIPP lining vs. trench sewer line replacement.

CIPP Pipe Lining Pros:

• Less invasive – No need to dig up your yard as entire process happens from within pipe.
• Saves landscaping – Avoid tearing up lawns, gardens, driveways that trenching requires.
• Reduced disruption – Sewer remains in service during repairs, no plumbing downtime.
• Faster repairs – CIPP projects often completed in one day rather than weeks.
• Long-term solution – CIPP can last 50+ years with proper installation.
• Lower cost – CIPP averages $40-$100 per linear foot, sewer replace is $100-$250 per foot.

CIPP Pipe Lining Cons:

• Only option for deterioration, not upsizing pipes – Cannot increase pipe size with CIPP.
• Not suited for complete collapses – Any fully collapsed sections may still need replacing.
• Risk of failure if not done properly – Proper CIPP training and application is crucial.
• Upfront inspection costs – CCTV inspection required to confirm CIPP is appropriate.
• Repeat linings can get expensive – Costs add up if relining pipes multiple times.

Sewer Line Replacement Pros:

• Can resize pipes – Can upgrade to larger pipes to improve flow.
• Fixes any damage – Fully collapsed pipes can be swapped with new.
• Renewal of all materials – Can replace pipes, connections, joints, etc.

Sewer Line Replacement Cons:

• Highly disruptive – Yard excavations, jackhammering, plumbing downtime.
• Much greater expense – Average double the cost or more versus CIPP.
• Long repairs – Projects take weeks or months compared to days.
• Yard restoration required – Major landscaping repairs needed after.
• Road closures sometimes – Street digging can require rerouting traffic.

For moderately deteriorated pipes without complete collapses, CIPP is often the preferable option to avoid the major headaches and costs of total sewer line replacement. But for fully deteriorated pipes and upgrading pipe size, replacement may be the right fix. Assess your situation carefully with professional input. Both CIPP and replacement have their pros and cons.

“CIPP vs. Traditional Sewer Line Replacement: Pros and Cons”

When your sewer line needs repair, you have two main options – CIPP pipe lining or traditional pipe replacement. How do you choose between cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining and just digging up and replacing your old sewer line? Here we’ll compare and contrast the pros and cons of CIPP lining vs. trench sewer line replacement.

CIPP Pipe Lining Pros:

• Less invasive – No need to dig up your yard as entire process happens from within pipe.
• Saves landscaping – Avoid tearing up lawns, gardens, driveways that trenching requires.
• Reduced disruption – Sewer remains in service during repairs, no plumbing downtime.
• Faster repairs – CIPP projects often completed in one day rather than weeks.
• Long-term solution – CIPP can last 50+ years with proper installation.
• Lower cost – CIPP averages $40-$100 per linear foot, sewer replace is $100-$250 per foot.

CIPP Pipe Lining Cons:

• Only option for deterioration, not upsizing pipes – Cannot increase pipe size with CIPP.
• Not suited for complete collapses – Any fully collapsed sections may still need replacing.
• Risk of failure if not done properly – Proper CIPP training and application is crucial.
• Upfront inspection costs – CCTV inspection required to confirm CIPP is appropriate.
• Repeat linings can get expensive – Costs add up if relining pipes multiple times.

Sewer Line Replacement Pros:

• Can resize pipes – Can upgrade to larger pipes to improve flow.
• Fixes any damage – Fully collapsed pipes can be swapped with new.
• Renewal of all materials – Can replace pipes, connections, joints, etc.

Sewer Line Replacement Cons:

• Highly disruptive – Yard excavations, jackhammering, plumbing downtime.
• Much greater expense – Average double the cost or more versus CIPP.
• Long repairs – Projects take weeks or months compared to days.
• Yard restoration required – Major landscaping repairs needed after.
• Road closures sometimes – Street digging can require rerouting traffic.

For moderately deteriorated pipes without complete collapses, CIPP is often the preferable option to avoid the major headaches and costs of total sewer line replacement. But for fully deteriorated pipes and upgrading pipe size, replacement may be the right fix. Assess your situation carefully with professional input. Both CIPP and replacement have their pros and cons.